Welcome to the mirror world, in which every particle in the known universe could have a counterpart. This cosmos would hold mirror planets, mirror stars, and even mirror life. The concept may sound as fantastic as the world that Lewis Carroll's Alice encountered through the looking glass. But proponents of the mirror world, a notion that dates back to the 1950s, say its existence would solve a number of puzzles in physics and cosmology. Sol - Jan 15, 2004 7:27 pm (#4 of 19) If Experience Can House Definite Patterns? Sol - Jan 17, 2004 3:48 pm (#5 of 19) Welcome to the Lewis Carroll Society of North America (LCSNA) home page. The LCSNA is a non-profit organization dedicated to furthering Carroll studies, increasing accessibility of research material, and maintaining public awareness of Carroll's contributions to society. We intend to use the internet as another avenue to accomplish these goals. If you are a Carrollian and would like to help in these endeavors, or if you simply enjoy Carroll and want to be among other people with a like interest, please consider joining the LCSNA. http://www.lewiscarroll.org/ Sol - Jan 17, 2004 3:54 pm (#6 of 19) #238 Looking-glass fieldsPosted by sol on November 25, 2002 at 11:07:27: DonQ,When ever I spoke about what I had distilled from al of my experiences and studying, was that I said that 'the real reality was behind the mirror.' What I meant by that was that it only reflects the physical things we construct in our brainI have understood this I think when I wrote the Kirlian. That in this understanding, if one was to develope the world inside, that world outside, allowed the perception of things to enter.That if, the finer perceptions of reality, had been worked through, the way through the emotive world, would have been understood. It was indeed the struggle to have identified this emotive world, to know the value of the experience we might have found ourselves reliving, that we would have been caught in the turbulence of such fields.Developement of the observer was crucial in having layed this foundation securely. The you who could move into many worlds of observation, that you would had never been allowed, had you not taken this journey.So what does simultaneous mean then here. That the inner world is reflected in the outer world, or the outer world is reflected in the inner, and we would have understood something much more.It requires that in this journey of understanding we had come to know of the value of the work on emotions, that we would now as a observer not only see into this past, but also recogize the potential of any future.So who is this person DonQ, that could move through all phases of experiece and still function in the reality outside, to have known the journey inside? Something was retained in these worlds of experience , that now make there way into view.The dream world hapharzard as so many had understood, becomes more, when we learn to observe the reality that we could have had this opportuity of the creative function, to have such worlds designed for us and what happens?The world of dreams now become better understood. How could this not have been a consequence when you have learnt to understand the value of the emotive world to sense the consolidation of forces into a picture sequence for us.Toward this end, this sense of being, the core person of who you are, you become familair with this observer now. It took me time to phrase this and understand the distinction between the person in the dream image, as me , when I watched the experience. Moving one way I was the person in the dream, in another I was watching this person in the dream. This last position made it very clear the distinction we could have been caught in, had we choose to live in experience. Or set back and watch experience?:)It require the developing of a EGO that could survive in this illusatory world, to have recognize its construction as well as its inevitable causes and its future.It is here the discussion with Doc, and the issues of Zen need clarification, in that when we learn to recognize the faces of such constrcution, the real ego, not soemthing in defensse of its survival, but of what could move through these worlds of illusions, to ahve understood the creative abilities we all implore inour existance.The explorer must know, that to move into this world, one must have constructed a sound mind. That it could have move through all existance, and although fully reocgnizing, it is still touched by emotive consequences and stil lives here. That such futures, are well within your hands to have determine your future. If we had succumbed to being tossed on the wave of emotive exiatnce, how could we have discern a schematic reality that such a mind could have built paradigms of perception?This ability to have layed the foundations of perception are equally real, that once we have developed any model , that such perceptions could have dictated future consequences.If we did not know this, about the constructive capabilties of the EGo, could we have ascertain what evoltuion to perfection could have ever existed? There had to be a way to weight the choices we make.This of course leads to Morphic resonance and the inherent pattern that is in each of us to this point, to have understod such patterns developed by the ego, have ben learnt repsonses to reality and existance.Developing this understadning, the morphic resonance becomes better understood on what forces will have gathered around any statement or position in belief. To have understood that your last stand, as a belief, will have brought a world of consequence to you accordingly.Sol Sol - Jan 17, 2004 3:54 pm (#7 of 19) Posted by sol on November 19, 2002 at 06:18:28: Maybe undertanding the fundamentals of spin, we have now understood the oscillatory nature of movement here, in the ideas of a sheet that could move to a positive value, as well as a negative. We are seeing this geometrical consideration, in the hyperbolic and spherical manifestation inclination? Zeropoint recognizes that oscillatory movement will have settled some place, yet still retain a shape.The curvature parmeters exist here then, in our understanding of what could exist simultaneously, and have included in the sheet, a understanding now of what could gather in this presence( higgs field) as well as the actions of relativity in any frame of reference. We just have to describe our connection to the causative evaluations of the minds work here, to have undertood the shaping of the reality that is going on:) http://www.sciencenews.org/20000909/bob23.jpg A link that supports the idea here in terms of what could have been the supporting factor of reality as well as, the pictures linked to source?Sol Sol - Jan 17, 2004 3:55 pm (#8 of 19) Posted by sol on November 19, 2002 at 06:30:03: makes precise predictions for the quantum numbers and selection rules for many new particles. What is much more difficult is predicting the masses of these additional supersymmetric particles. The reason for this is that SUSY must be a so-called "broken" or hidden symmetry, and the mechanism of communication of SUSY breaking to the SM and its superpartners is inevitably indirect, not well constrained, and is poorly understood.So what have we done here but have given a picture of movement that we had not understood before, and how did this become possible?It required that we understand the string, and its evolution to branes, to help us understand the interactive value of movement here.The Higg's field, just brings us closer to undrstanding what is is inherent in any string. That what we have now understood, shapes reality? Hopefully I have painted a good picture through the links in this forum, that we now understand the value of topological movement in any expression, and silently, it is happening all around us?:)Sol See: Math of Supersymmetry See: Jim Gates, a supersymmetrist from superspace Sol - Jan 17, 2004 4:30 pm (#9 of 19) Ebook kx21 - Jan 19, 2004 6:14 am (#10 of 19) Beyond Yellow Brick Road? kx21 Sol - Jan 19, 2004 4:09 pm (#11 of 19) Edited Jan 20, 2004 9:18 pm We Measure a Distance in Time...but the undertanding of alchemcial processes, are contained in the images. Like a Mandala can be projected from the center, it's reality is defined in the realities of life. Betrayal of Images" by Rene Magritte. 1929 painting on which is written "This is not a Pipe". The jest here recognizes, that a picture of, and the real pipe are very different indeed. How is "form" percieved from perspective. The picture of the pipe and the real pipe are different things? And yet in this comparison, there is a third aspect as the idea? Sol (8 following messages)
If Experience Can House Definite Patterns?
Welcome to the Lewis Carroll Society of North America (LCSNA) home page. The LCSNA is a non-profit organization dedicated to furthering Carroll studies, increasing accessibility of research material, and maintaining public awareness of Carroll's contributions to society. We intend to use the internet as another avenue to accomplish these goals. If you are a Carrollian and would like to help in these endeavors, or if you simply enjoy Carroll and want to be among other people with a like interest, please consider joining the LCSNA. http://www.lewiscarroll.org/
#238 Looking-glass fields
Posted by sol on November 25, 2002 at 11:07:27:
DonQ,
When ever I spoke about what I had distilled from al of my experiences and studying, was that I said that 'the real reality was behind the mirror.' What I meant by that was that it only reflects the physical things we construct in our brain
I have understood this I think when I wrote the Kirlian.
That in this understanding, if one was to develope the world inside, that world outside, allowed the perception of things to enter.
That if, the finer perceptions of reality, had been worked through, the way through the emotive world, would have been understood. It was indeed the struggle to have identified this emotive world, to know the value of the experience we might have found ourselves reliving, that we would have been caught in the turbulence of such fields.
Developement of the observer was crucial in having layed this foundation securely. The you who could move into many worlds of observation, that you would had never been allowed, had you not taken this journey.
So what does simultaneous mean then here. That the inner world is reflected in the outer world, or the outer world is reflected in the inner, and we would have understood something much more.
It requires that in this journey of understanding we had come to know of the value of the work on emotions, that we would now as a observer not only see into this past, but also recogize the potential of any future.
So who is this person DonQ, that could move through all phases of experiece and still function in the reality outside, to have known the journey inside? Something was retained in these worlds of experience , that now make there way into view.
The dream world hapharzard as so many had understood, becomes more, when we learn to observe the reality that we could have had this opportuity of the creative function, to have such worlds designed for us and what happens?
The world of dreams now become better understood. How could this not have been a consequence when you have learnt to understand the value of the emotive world to sense the consolidation of forces into a picture sequence for us.
Toward this end, this sense of being, the core person of who you are, you become familair with this observer now. It took me time to phrase this and understand the distinction between the person in the dream image, as me , when I watched the experience. Moving one way I was the person in the dream, in another I was watching this person in the dream. This last position made it very clear the distinction we could have been caught in, had we choose to live in experience. Or set back and watch experience?:)
It require the developing of a EGO that could survive in this illusatory world, to have recognize its construction as well as its inevitable causes and its future.
It is here the discussion with Doc, and the issues of Zen need clarification, in that when we learn to recognize the faces of such constrcution, the real ego, not soemthing in defensse of its survival, but of what could move through these worlds of illusions, to ahve understood the creative abilities we all implore inour existance.
The explorer must know, that to move into this world, one must have constructed a sound mind. That it could have move through all existance, and although fully reocgnizing, it is still touched by emotive consequences and stil lives here. That such futures, are well within your hands to have determine your future. If we had succumbed to being tossed on the wave of emotive exiatnce, how could we have discern a schematic reality that such a mind could have built paradigms of perception?
This ability to have layed the foundations of perception are equally real, that once we have developed any model , that such perceptions could have dictated future consequences.
If we did not know this, about the constructive capabilties of the EGo, could we have ascertain what evoltuion to perfection could have ever existed? There had to be a way to weight the choices we make.
This of course leads to Morphic resonance and the inherent pattern that is in each of us to this point, to have understod such patterns developed by the ego, have ben learnt repsonses to reality and existance.
Developing this understadning, the morphic resonance becomes better understood on what forces will have gathered around any statement or position in belief. To have understood that your last stand, as a belief, will have brought a world of consequence to you accordingly.
Sol
Posted by sol on November 19, 2002 at 06:18:28:
Maybe undertanding the fundamentals of spin, we have now understood the oscillatory nature of movement here, in the ideas of a sheet that could move to a positive value, as well as a negative.
We are seeing this geometrical consideration, in the hyperbolic and spherical manifestation inclination? Zeropoint recognizes that oscillatory movement will have settled some place, yet still retain a shape.
The curvature parmeters exist here then, in our understanding of what could exist simultaneously, and have included in the sheet, a understanding now of what could gather in this presence( higgs field) as well as the actions of relativity in any frame of reference.
We just have to describe our connection to the causative evaluations of the minds work here, to have undertood the shaping of the reality that is going on:)
http://www.sciencenews.org/20000909/bob23.jpg
A link that supports the idea here in terms of what could have been the supporting factor of reality as well as, the pictures linked to source?
Posted by sol on November 19, 2002 at 06:30:03:
makes precise predictions for the quantum numbers and selection rules for many new particles. What is much more difficult is predicting the masses of these additional supersymmetric particles. The reason for this is that SUSY must be a so-called "broken" or hidden symmetry, and the mechanism of communication of SUSY breaking to the SM and its superpartners is inevitably indirect, not well constrained, and is poorly understood.
So what have we done here but have given a picture of movement that we had not understood before, and how did this become possible?
It required that we understand the string, and its evolution to branes, to help us understand the interactive value of movement here.
The Higg's field, just brings us closer to undrstanding what is is inherent in any string. That what we have now understood, shapes reality?
Hopefully I have painted a good picture through the links in this forum, that we now understand the value of topological movement in any expression, and silently, it is happening all around us?:)
Sol See: Math of Supersymmetry See: Jim Gates, a supersymmetrist from superspace
Ebook
Beyond Yellow Brick Road?
kx21
We Measure a Distance in Time
...but the undertanding of alchemcial processes, are contained in the images. Like a Mandala can be projected from the center, it's reality is defined in the realities of life. Betrayal of Images" by Rene Magritte. 1929 painting on which is written "This is not a Pipe". The jest here recognizes, that a picture of, and the real pipe are very different indeed. How is "form" percieved from perspective. The picture of the pipe and the real pipe are different things? And yet in this comparison, there is a third aspect as the idea? Sol
(2 previous messages)
- Jan 10, 2004 5:04 am (#3 of 19)
Alice in Wonderland ( a Real World Fantasy )